The degree to which someone trusts the information depicted in a chart can depend on their assumptions about who made the data visualization, according to a pair of studies by MIT researchers.

For instance, if someone infers that a graph about a controversial topic like gun violence was produced by an organization they feel is in opposition with their beliefs or political views, they may discredit the information or dismiss the visualization all together.

The researchers found that even the clearest visualizations often communicate more than the data they explicitly depict, and can elicit strong judgments from viewers about the social contexts, identities, and characteristics of those who made the chart.

Readers make these assessments about the social context of a visualization primarily from its design features, like the color palette or the way information is arranged, rather than the underlying data. Often, these inferences are unintended by the designers.

Qualitative and quantitative studies revealed that these social inferences aren’t restricted to certain subgroups, nor are they caused by limited data literacy.

The researchers consolidate their findings into a framework that scientists and communicators can use to think critically about how design choices might affect these social assumptions. Ultimately, they hope this work leads to better strategies for scientific communication.

“If you are scrolling through social media and you see a chart, and you immediately dismiss it as something an influencer has produced just to get attention, that shapes your entire experience with the chart before you even dig into the data. We’ve shown in these papers that visualizations do more than just communicate the data they are depicting — they also communicate other social signals,” says Arvind Satyanarayan, an associate professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and co-senior author of this research.

He is joined on the paper by co-lead authors Amy Rae Fox, a former CSAIL postdoc, and Michelle Morgenstern, a current postdoc in MIT’s anthropology program; and co-senior author Graham M. Jones, professor of anthropology. Two related papers on this research will be presented at the IEEE Visualization Conference.

Charts as social artifacts

During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, social media was awash in charts from organizations like the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which were designed to convey information about the spread of disease.

The MIT researchers studied how these visualizations were being used to discuss the pandemic. They found that some citizen scientists were using the underlying data to make visualizations of their own, challenging the findings of mainstream science.

“This was an unexpected discovery as, previously, citizen scientists were typically aligned with mainstream scientists. It took us a few years to figure out how to study this phenomenon more deeply,” Satyanarayan says.

Most research into data visualization studies how charts communicate data. Instead, the researchers wanted to explore visualizations from a social and linguistic perspective to assess the information they convey beyond the data.

Linguistic anthropologists have found that, while language allows people to communicate ideas, it also holds social meaning beyond the words people use. For instance, an accent or dialect can indicate that someone is part of a particular community.

By “pointing” to certain social meanings, identities, and characteristics, language serves what is known as a socio-indexical function.

“We wanted to see if things in the visual language of data communication might point to certain institutions, or the kinds of people in those institutions, that carry a meaning that could be unintended by the makers of the visualization,” Jones says.

To do this, the researchers conducted an initial, qualitative study of users on the social media platform Tumblr. During one-on-one interviews, the researchers showed users a variety of real visualizations from online sources, as well as modified visualizations where they removed the textual information, like titles and axes labels.

Stripping out the textual information was particularly important, since it mimics the way people often interact with online visualizations.

“Our engagement with social media is a few quick seconds. People aren’t taking the time to read the title of a chart or look at the data very carefully,” Satyanarayan says.

The interviews revealed that users made detailed inferences about the people or organizations who created the visualizations based on what they called “vibes,” design elements, like colors or the use of certain graphics. These inferences in turn impacted their trust in the data.

For instance, after seeing a chart with the flags of Georgia and Texas and a graph with two lines in red and black, but no text, one user said, “This kind of looks like something a Texas Republican (legislator) would put on Twitter or on their website, or as part of a campaign presentation.”

A quantitative approach

Building on this initial work, the researchers used the same methodology in three quantitative studies involving surveys sent to larger groups of people from a variety of backgrounds.

They found the same phenomenon: People make inferences about the social context of a visualization based on its design, which can lead to misunderstandings about, and mistrust in, the data it depicts.

For instance, users felt some visualizations were so neatly arranged they believed them to be advertisements, and therefore not trustworthy. In another example, one user dismissed a chart by a Pulitzer-prize winning designer because they felt the hand-drawn graphical style indicated it was made by “some female Instagram influencer who is just trying to look for attention.”

“If that is the first reaction someone has to a chart, it is going to massively impact the degree to which they trust it,” Satyanarayan says.

Moreover, when the researchers reintroduced text in the visualizations from which it had been removed, users still made these social inferences.

Typically, in data visualization, the solution to such a problem would be to create clearer charts or educate people about data literacy. But this research points to a completely different kind of data literacy, Jones says.

“It is not erroneous for people to be drawing these inferences. It requires a lot of cultural knowledge about where visualizations come from, how they are made, and how they circulate. Drawing these inferences is a feature, not a bug, of the way we use signs,” he says.

From these results, they created a classification framework to organize the social inferences users made and the design elements that contributed to them. They hope the typology serves as a tool designers can use to develop more effective visualizations, as well as a starting point for additional studies.

Moving forward, the researchers want to continue exploring the role of data visualizations as social artifacts, perhaps by drilling down on each design feature they identified in the typology. They also want to expand the scope of their study to include visualizations in research papers and scientific journals.

“Part of the value of this work is a methodological contribution to render a set of phenomena amenable to experimental study. But this work is also important because it showcases an interdisciplinary cross-pollination that is powerful and unique to MIT,” Jones says.

This work was supported, in part, by MIT METEOR and PFPFEE fellowships, an Amar G. Bose Fellowship, an Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, and the National Science Foundation.

Coming from a small high school in rural South Dakota that didn’t offer advanced placement (AP) classes, Titus Roesler ’25 didn’t have the easiest start at MIT. But when his efforts to catch up academically to his peers led to a job as a teaching assistant, it changed everything.

Roesler, who graduated last spring with a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering and is now working on a master’s, has built a reputation for himself as a student-teacher at MIT. Since discovering his affinity for teaching and mentoring, he’s been a teaching assistant for four different classes and designed two seminars from scratch.

Through teaching, Roesler has not only helped other students, but also improved his own grasp of complex subjects. That includes signal processing, which involves manipulating signals, such as radio waves, to make them more useful for applications like wireless communications. He has become fascinated by the topic and hopes to continue working in the field.

Roesler lights up when talking about teaching, but he didn’t always think it was in the cards.

“I don't know that anyone who knew me pre-MIT would believe that I do things like give recitations to crowded rooms, because I think everyone thought, ‘Titus is that quiet kid, he never talked at all.’”

Learning through teaching

Growing up in Marion, South Dakota, a town with a population around 800, Roesler didn’t have MIT on his radar, but he knew he liked math. His high school capstone project involved helping his classmates on the math section of the ACT, and he tutored a few of his classmates. His teacher let him teach trigonometry one day, and he toured local colleges with the plan of becoming a high school math teacher.

But that changed after he self-studied calculus through MIT’s OpenCourseWare offerings and set his sights on the Institute.

Roesler worked overtime during his first year at MIT to catch up with what his peers had learned back in high school. On his first physics exam, he answered only one question correctly — a multiple-choice question he had guessed on. But MIT’s Experimental Study Group (ESG) kept him afloat during his first year, and it quickly led to more opportunities.

When, in the spring of his first year, his multivariable calculus instructor asked him to stay after class one day, Roesler was sure he was in trouble. She actually wanted to see if he could TA for her next year.

“I was flattered because there was still a month left in the class. Plenty of time for me to fail,” Roesler jokes.

He loved the job. During a Friday night office hour session, he stayed for extra hours to help a student whom he saw a lot of himself in — someone who was also from a rural background and had also entered MIT without a strong mathematics background. He went on to become the student’s tutor. The position gave him the opportunity to be the teacher he’d always wanted to have.

As a TA, “I wasn't coming at things from the perspective of ‘Everyone already knows A, B, C’ before I explained. I would always try to start from the ground up and give my perspective on it,” Roesler says.

From his mentorship and teaching work, he received the Undergraduate Teaching Award from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Outstanding Associate Advisor Award from the Office of the First Year. After joining ESG during his first year, Roesler stayed on as an associate advisor in the learning community for the next three years. His work earned him the Fiekowsky Award for Excellence in Teaching and the Fiekowsky Award for Community Service.

The right blend

Signal processing, the focus of his graduate work, “is where calculus, geometry, linear algebra, probability, statistics, algorithms, and numerical analysis all come into play on practical problems of real-world interest,” Roesler says. “For me, it’s the right blend of theory and application.”

Due to the field’s wide scope, Roesler notices potential applications for signal processing everywhere, and how different fields intersect within the discipline. “Everything comes together in just the right way,” he says.

He is especially interested in signal-processing problems such as source separation, which aims to recover a set of source signals from a set of mixed signals. During his senior year, he spent two semesters on a project where he wrote a Python program to separate harmonies in Bach chorales.

For his master’s degree, following a summer research internship at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Roesler has stayed at the laboratory, this time venturing into high-frequency radio communications. He’s currently working on a research project that applies the theory of compressed sensing (which states that, under certain conditions, it is possible to reconstruct signals from very few measurements) to communications.

What fascinates Roesler are “something-from-nothing” problems.

“The kind of problems I’m interested in are underdetermined, inverse problems,” he says. For example, imagine trying to reconstruct a full image from only a handful of pixels. While on the surface this seems impossible, researchers have recovered quality images by applying the techniques of compressed sensing.

Running and serving

Roesler has also spent extensive time running, a sport he’s loved since fifth grade. In 2023, he raced a marathon in 2 hours and 46 minutes and went on to run the Boston Marathon in both 2024 and 2025. To prepare, he spent a lot of time reading up on the psychology of running, which he says was the first time he used the scientific method. Now, he just runs for fun and uses it as a way to focus and collect this thoughts.

He has also served on the executive team of the Undergraduate Mathematics Association, as a resident peer mentor at Baker House, and a tutor for two classes. At the PKG Center, he’s been a program lead and counselor for its pre-orientation program.

Roesler still gets excited about seeing the impact of his teaching. At the end of one semester teaching a tutorial, he took his class on a picnic. They surprised him with a card and a bag of goodies. 

Recalling the moment, he says: “I thought, How does it get better? It was wonderful.”

Nervous system functions, from motion to perception to cognition, depend on the active zones of neural circuit connections, or “synapses,” sending out the right amount of their chemical signals at the right times. By tracking how synaptic active zones form and mature in fruit flies, researchers at The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at MIT have revealed a fundamental model for how neural activity during development builds properly working connections.

Understanding how that happens is important, not only for advancing fundamental knowledge about how nervous systems develop, but also because many disorders such as epilepsy, autism, or intellectual disability can arise from aberrations of synaptic transmission, says senior author Troy Littleton, the Menicon Professor in The Picower Institute and MIT’s Department of Biology. The new findings, funded in part by a 2021 grant from the National Institutes of Health, provide insights into how active zones develop the ability to send neurotransmitters across synapses to their circuit targets. It’s not instant or predestined, the study shows. It can take days to fully mature, and that is regulated by neural activity.

If scientists can fully understand the process, Littleton says, then they can develop molecular strategies to intervene to tweak synaptic transmission when it’s happening too much or too little in disease.

“We’d like to have the levers to push to make synapses stronger or weaker, that’s for sure,” Littleton says. “And so knowing the full range of levers we can tug on to potentially change output would be exciting.”

Littleton Lab research scientist Yuliya Akbergenova led the study published Oct. 14 in the Journal of Neuroscience.

How newborn synapses grow up

In the study, the researchers examined neurons that send the neurotransmitter glutamate across synapses to control muscles in the fly larvae. To study how the active zones in the animals matured, the scientists needed to keep track of their age. That hasn’t been possible before, but Akbergenova overcame the barrier by cleverly engineering the fluorescent protein mMaple, which changes its glow from green to red when zapped with 15 seconds of ultraviolet light, into a component of the glutamate receptors on the receiving side of the synapse. Then, whenever she wanted, she could shine light and all the synapses already formed before that time would glow red, and any new ones that formed subsequently would glow green.

With the ability to track each active zone’s birthday, the authors could then document how active zones developed their ability to increase output over the course of days after birth. The researchers actually watched as synapses were built over many hours by tagging each of eight kinds of proteins that make up an active zone. At first, the active zones couldn’t transmit anything. Then, as some essential early proteins accumulated, they could send out glutamate spontaneously, but not if evoked by electrical stimulation of their host neuron (simulating how that neuron might be signaled naturally in a circuit). Only after several more proteins arrived did active zones possess the mature structure for calcium ions to trigger the fusion of glutamate vesicles to the cell membrane for evoked release across the synapse.

Activity matters

Of course, construction does not go on forever. At some point, the fly larva stops building one synapse and then builds new ones further down the line as the neuronal axon expands to keep up with growing muscles. The researchers wondered whether neural activity had a role in driving that process of finishing up one active zone and moving on to build the next.

To find out, they employed two different interventions to block active zones from being able to release glutamate, thereby preventing synaptic activity. Notably, one of the methods they chose was blocking the action of a protein called Synaptotagmin 1. That’s important because mutations that disrupt the protein in humans are associated with severe intellectual disability and autism. Moreover, the researchers tailored the activity-blocking interventions to just one neuron in each larva because blocking activity in all their neurons would have proved lethal.

In neurons where the researchers blocked activity, they observed two consequences: the neurons stopped building new active zones and instead kept making existing active zones larger and larger. It was as if the neuron could tell the active zone wasn’t releasing glutamate and tried to make it work by giving it more protein material to work with. That effort came at the expense of starting construction on new active zones.

“I think that what it’s trying to do is compensate for the loss of activity,” Littleton says.

Testing indicated that the enlarged active zones the neurons built in hopes of restarting activity were functional (or would have been if the researchers weren’t artificially blocking them). This suggested that the way the neuron sensed that glutamate wasn’t being released was therefore likely to be a feedback signal from the muscle side of the synapse. To test that, the scientists knocked out a glutamate receptor component in the muscle, and when they did, they found that the neurons no longer made their active zones larger.

Littleton says the lab is already looking into the new questions the discoveries raise. In particular: What are the molecular pathways that initiate synapse formation in the first place, and what are the signals that tell an active zone it has finished growing? Finding those answers will bring researchers closer to understanding how to intervene when synaptic active zones aren’t developing properly.

In addition to Littleton and Akbergenova, the paper’s other authors are Jessica Matthias and Sofya Makeyeva.

In addition to the National Institutes of Health, The Freedom Together Foundation provided funding for the study.

When it comes to artificial intelligence, MIT and IBM were there at the beginning: laying foundational work and creating some of the first programs — AI predecessors — and theorizing how machine “intelligence” might come to be.

Today, collaborations like the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, which launched eight years ago, are continuing to deliver expertise for the promise of tomorrow’s AI technology. This is critical for industries and the labor force that stand to benefit, particularly in the short term: from $3-4 trillion of forecast global economic benefits and 80 percent productivity gains for knowledge workers and creative tasks, to significant incorporations of generative AI into business processes (80 percent) and software applications (70 percent) in the next three years.

While industry has seen a boom in notable models, chiefly in the past year, academia continues to drive the innovation, contributing most of the highly cited research. At the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, success takes the form of 54 patent disclosures, an excess of 128,000 citations with an h-index of 162, and more than 50 industry-driven use cases. Some of the lab’s many achievements include improved stent placement with AI imaging techniques, slashing computational overhead, shrinking models while maintaining performance, and modeling of interatomic potential for silicate chemistry.

“The lab is uniquely positioned to identify the ‘right’ problems to solve, setting us apart from other entities,” says Aude Oliva, lab MIT director and director of strategic industry engagement in the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing. “Further, the experience our students gain from working on these challenges for enterprise AI translates to their competitiveness in the job market and the promotion of a competitive industry.”

“The MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab has had tremendous impact by bringing together a rich set of collaborations between IBM and MIT’s researchers and students,” says Provost Anantha Chandrakasan, who is the lab’s MIT co-chair and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “By supporting cross-cutting research at the intersection of AI and many other disciplines, the lab is advancing foundational work and accelerating the development of transformative solutions for our nation and the world.”

Long-horizon work

As AI continues to garner interest, many organizations struggle to channel the technology into meaningful outcomes. A 2024 Gartner study finds that, “at least 30% of generative AI projects will be abandoned after proof of concept by the end of 2025,” demonstrating ambition and widespread hunger for AI, but a lack of knowledge for how to develop and apply it to create immediate value.

Here, the lab shines, bridging research and deployment. The majority of the lab’s current-year research portfolio is aligned to use and develop new features, capacities, or products for IBM, the lab’s corporate members, or real-world applications. The last of these comprise large language models, AI hardware, and foundation models, including multi-modal, bio-medical, and geo-spatial ones. Inquiry-driven students and interns are invaluable in this pursuit, offering enthusiasm and new perspectives while accumulating domain knowledge to help derive and engineer advancements in the field, as well as opening up new frontiers for exploration with AI as a tool.

Findings from the AAAI 2025 Presidential panel on the Future of AI Research support the need for contributions from academia-industry collaborations like the lab in the AI arena: “Academics have a role to play in providing independent advice and interpretations of these results [from industry] and their consequences. The private sector focuses more on the short term, and universities and society more on a longer-term perspective.”

Bringing these strengths together, along with the push for open sourcing and open science, can spark innovation that neither could achieve alone. History shows that embracing these principles, and sharing code and making research accessible, has long-term benefits for both the sector and society. In line with IBM and MIT’s missions, the lab contributes technologies, findings, governance, and standards to the public sphere through this collaboration, thereby enhancing transparency, accelerating reproducibility, and ensuring trustworthy advances.

The lab was created to merge MIT’s deep research expertise with IBM’s industrial R&D capacity, aiming for breakthroughs in core AI methods and hardware, as well as new applications in areas like health care, chemistry, finance, cybersecurity, and robust planning and decision-making for business.

Bigger isn't always better

Today, large foundation models are giving way to smaller, more task-specific models yielding better performance. Contributions from lab members like Song Han, associate professor in the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), and IBM Research’s Chuang Gan help make this possible, through work such as once-for-all and AWQ. Innovations such as these improve efficiency with better architectures, algorithm shrinking, and activation-aware weight quantization, letting models like language processing run on edge devices at faster speeds and reduced latency.

Consequently, foundation, vision, multimodal, and large language models have seen benefits, allowing for the lab research groups of Oliva, MIT EECS Associate Professor Yoon Kim, and IBM Research members Rameswar Panda, Yang Zhang, and Rogerio Feris to build on the work. This includes techniques to imbue models with external knowledge and the development of linear attention transformer methods for higher throughput, compared to other state-of-the-art systems. 

Understanding and reasoning in vision and multimodal systems has also seen a boon. Works like “Task2Sim” and “AdaFuse” demonstrate improved vision model performance if pre-training takes place on synthetic data, and how video action recognition can be boosted by fusing channels from past and current feature maps.

As part of a commitment to leaner AI, the lab teams of Gregory Wornell, the MIT EECS Sumitomo Electric Industries Professor in Engineering, IBM Research’s Chuang Gan, and David Cox, VP for foundational AI at IBM Research and the lab’s IBM director, have shown that model adaptability and data efficiency can go hand in hand. Two approaches, EvoScale and Chain-of-Action-Thought reasoning (COAT), enable language models to make the most of limited data and computation by improving on prior generation attempts through structured iteration, narrowing in on a better response. COAT uses a meta-action framework and reinforcement learning to tackle reasoning-intensive tasks via self-correction, while EvoScale brings a similar philosophy to code generation, evolving high-quality candidate solutions. These techniques help to enable resource-conscious, targeted, real-world deployment.

“The impact of MIT-IBM research on our large language model development efforts cannot be overstated,” says Cox. “We’re seeing that smaller, more specialized models and tools are having an outsized impact, especially when they are combined. Innovations from the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab help shape these technical directions and influence the strategy we are taking in the market through platforms like watsonx.”

For example, numerous lab projects have contributed features, capabilities, and uses to IBM’s Granite Vision, which provides impressive computer vision designed for document understanding, despite its compact size. This comes at a time when there’s a growing need for extraction, interpretation, and trustworthy summarization of information and data contained in long formats for enterprise purposes.

Other achievements that extend beyond direct research on AI and across disciplines are not only beneficial, but necessary for advancing the technology and lifting up society, concludes the 2025 AAAI panel.

Work from the lab’s Caroline Uhler and Devavrat Shah — both Andrew (1956) and Erna Viterbi Professors in EECS and the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS) — along with IBM Research’s Kristjan Greenewald, transcends specializations. They are developing causal discovery methods to uncover how interventions affect outcomes, and identify which ones achieve desired results. The studies include developing a framework that can both elucidate how “treatments” for different sub-populations may play out, like on an ecommerce platform or mobility restrictions on morbidity outcomes. Findings from this body of work could influence the fields of marketing and medicine to education and risk management.

“Advances in AI and other areas of computing are influencing how people formulate and tackle challenges in nearly every discipline. At the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, researchers recognize this cross-cutting nature of their work and its impact, interrogating problems from multiple viewpoints and bringing real-world problems from industry, in order to develop novel solutions,” says Dan Huttenlocher, MIT lab co-chair, dean of the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, and the Henry Ellis Warren (1894) Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

A significant piece of what makes this research ecosystem thrive is the steady influx of student talent and their contributions through MIT’s Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP), MIT EECS 6A Program, and the new MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab Internship Program. Altogether, more than 70 young researchers have not only accelerated their technical skill development, but, through guidance and support by the lab’s mentors, gained knowledge in AI domains to become emerging practitioners themselves. This is why the lab continually seeks to identify promising students at all stages in their exploration of AI’s potential.

“In order to unlock the full economic and societal potential of AI, we need to foster ‘useful and efficient intelligence,’” says Sriram Raghavan, IBM Research VP for AI and IBM chair of the lab. “To translate AI promise into progress, it’s crucial that we continue to focus on innovations to develop efficient, optimized, and fit-for-purpose models that can easily be adapted to specific domains and use cases. Academic-industry collaborations, such as the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, help drive the breakthroughs that make this possible.”

Recently, more than 1,000 MIT students stepped into the shoes of global decision-makers by trying out En-ROADS, a simulation tool developed to test climate policies, explore solutions, and envision a cleaner and safer environmental future.

MIT is committed to climate action, and this year’s new student orientation showcased that commitment. For the first time ever, incoming Leaders for Global Operations (LGO), Executive MBA, Sloan Fellow MBA, MBA, and undergraduate students all explored the capabilities of En-ROADS.

“The goal is for MIT to become one of the world’s most prolific, collaborative, and interdisciplinary sources of technological, behavioral, and policy solutions for the global climate challenge over the next decade,” MIT Provost Anantha P. Chandrakasan told an audience of about 300 undergraduates from the Class of 2029. “It is something we need to do urgently, and today is your opportunity to play a role in that bold mission.”

Connecting passion with science for change

In group workshop sessions, students collaborated to create a world in which global warming stays well below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — the goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Backed by the latest science, the En-ROADS simulator let them explore firsthand how policies like carbon pricing and clean energy investments affect our climate, economy, and health. Over 450 incoming MBA students even role-played as delegates at a global climate summit conference, tasked with negotiating a global agreement to address the harm caused by climate change.

For first-year MBA student Allison Somuk, who played the role of President Xi Jinping of China, the workshop was not only eye-opening about climate, but also altered how she plans to approach her future work and advocacy.

“Before the simulation, I didn’t have data on climate change, so I was surprised to see how close we are to catastrophic temperature increases. What surprised me most was how difficult it was to slow that trajectory. It required significant action and compromise from nearly every sector, not just a few. As someone passionate about improving maternal health care in developing nations, my view of contributing factors has broadened. I now see how maternal health may be affected by a larger system where climate policy decisions directly affect women’s health outcomes.”

MIT Sloan Research Affiliate Andrew Jones, who is also executive director and co-founder of Climate Interactive and co-creator of the En-ROADS tool, presented several sessions during orientation. Looking back on the week, he found the experience personally rewarding.  

“Engaging with hundreds of students, I was inspired by the powerful alignment between their passion for climate action and MIT’s increased commitment to delivering on climate goals. This is a pivotal moment for breakthroughs on our campus.”

Other presenters included Jennifer Graham, MIT Sustainability Initiative senior associate director; Jason Jay, MIT Sustainability Initiative director; Krystal Noiseux, MIT Climate Pathways Project associate director; Bethany Patten, MIT Climate Policy Center executive director; and John Sterman, Jay W. Forrester Professor of Management, professor in the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, and director of the MIT System Dynamics Group.

Chris Rabe, the MIT Climate Project’s Education Program director, was impressed, but not surprised, by how much students learned so quickly as they worked together to solve the problem with En-ROADS.

“By integrating reflection, emotional dynamics, multi-generational perspectives, group work, and inquiry, the En-ROADS simulation provides an ideal foundation for first-year students to explore the breadth of climate and sustainability opportunities at MIT. In the process, students came to recognize the many levers and multi-solving approaches required to address the complex challenges of climate change.”

Inspiring climate leaders

The En-ROADS workshops were a true team effort, made possible with the help of senior staff at MIT Sloan School of Management and the MBA program office, and members of the MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative, Climate Pathways Project, Climate Policy Center, the Climate Project, Office of the First Year, and entire undergraduate Orientation team.

“Altogether, over a thousand of the newest members of the MIT community have now had a chance to learn for themselves about the climate crisis,” says Sterman, “and what we can do to create a healthier, safer, more prosperous, and more sustainable world — and how they can get involved to bring that world into being, even as first-year undergrads and MBAs.” 

By the end of the workshops, the students’ spirits were buoyed. They all had successfully found ways to keep global warming to below 2 C.  When asked, “What would you love about being part of this new future you’ve created?,”  a more positive, optimistic word cloud came into view. Answers included:

• breathing cleaner air;
• giving my children a better and safer environment;
• my hometown would not be flooded constantly;
• rich marine life and protection of reefs;
• exciting, new clean industries;
• increased socioeconomic equality; and
• proof that we as a global community can work together to save ourselves. 

First-year MBA student Ruby Eisenbud sums up the sentiment many new MIT students came away with after their workshop.

“Coming to Sloan, one of the questions on my mind was: How can we, as future leaders, make a positive impact related to climate change? While En-ROADS is a simulation, it felt like we experienced, in the smallest way, what it could be like to be a leader navigating the diverging interests of all stakeholders involved in mitigating the impacts of the climate crisis. While the simulation prompted us to face the difficult reality of climate change, it also reinforced my motivation to emphasize climate in my work at Sloan and beyond.”

On any given day, MIT’s famed 825-foot Infinite Corridor serves as a busy, buzzing pedestrian highway, offering campus commuters a quick, if congested, route from point A to B. With the possible exception of MIT Henge twice a year, it doesn’t exactly invite lingering.

Thanks to a recent renovation on the first floor of Building 11, the former location of Student Financial Services, there’s now a compelling reason for students to step off the busy throughfare and pause for conversation or respite.

Dubbed by one onlooker as “the spaceport,” the area has been transformed into an airy, multi-functional hub. Nestled inside is the Undergraduate Advising Center (UAC), which launched in 2023 to provide holistic support for students’ personal and academic growth by providing individualized advising for all four years, offering guidance about and connections to MIT resources, and partnering with faculty and departments to ensure a comprehensive advising experience.

Students can now find another key service conveniently located close by: Career Advising and Professional Development has moved into renovated office suites just down the hall, in Building 7.

“It’s just stunning!” marvels Diep Luu, senior associate dean and director of the UAC. “You can’t help but notice the contrast between the historic architecture and the contemporary design. The space is filled with natural light thanks to the floor-to-ceiling windows, and it makes the environment both energizing and comfortable.”

Designed by Merge Architects, the 5,000 square-foot space opens off the Infinite with several informal public spaces for students and community members. These include a series of soaring, vaulted booths with a variety of tables and seating to support multiple kinds of socialization and/or work, a cozy lounge lined with pi wallpaper (carried out to 10,638 digits after 3.14), and the “social stairs” for informal gatherings and workshops. Beyond that, glass doors lead to the UAC office space, which features open workstations, private advising rooms, and conference rooms with Zoom capability.

“We wanted to incorporate as many different kinds of spaces to accommodate as many different kinds of interactions as we could,” explains Kate Trimble, senior associate dean and chief of staff of the Division of Graduate and Undergraduate Education (GUE), who helped guide the renovation project. “After all, the UAC will support all undergraduate students for their entire four-year MIT journey, through a wide variety of experiences, challenges, and celebrations.”

Homing in on the  “Boardwalk or Park Place of MIT real estate”

The vision for the new district began to percolate in 2022. At the time, GUE (then known as the Office of the Vice Chancellor, or OVC) was focusing on two separate, key priorities: reconfiguring office space in a post-pandemic, flex-work world; and creating a new undergraduate advising center, in accordance with one of the Task Force 2021 recommendations.

A faculty and staff working group gathered information and ideas from offices and programs that had already implemented “flex-space” strategies, such as Human Resources, IS&T, and the MIT Innovation Headquarters. In thinking about an advising center of the size and scope envisioned, Trimble notes, “we quickly zeroed in on the Building 11 space. It’s such a prominent location. Former Vice Chancellor (and current Vice President for Research) Ian A. Waitz referred to it as the “Boardwalk or Park Place of MIT real estate. And if you’re thinking about a center that’s going to serve all undergraduates, you really want it to be convenient and centrally located — and boy, that’s a perfect space.”

As plans were made to relocate Student Financial Services to a new home in Building E17, the renovation team engaged undergraduate students and advising staff in the design process through a series of charrette-style workshops and focus groups. Students shared feedback about spaces on campus where they felt most comfortable, as well as those they disliked. From staff, the team learned which design elements would make the space as functional as possible, allowing for the variety of interactions they typically have with students.

The team selected Merge Architects for the project, Trimble says, because “they understood that we were not looking to build something that was an architectural temple, but rather a functional and fun space that meets the needs of our students and staff. They’ve been creative and responsive partners.” She also credits the MIT Campus Construction group and the Office of Campus Planning for their crucial role in the renovation. “I can’t say enough good things about them. They’ve been superb guides through a long and complicated process.”

A more student-centric Infinite Corridor

Construction wrapped up in late summer, and the UAC held an open house for students on Registration Day, Sept. 3. It buzzed with activity as students admired the space, chatted with UAC staff, took photos, and met the office mascot, Winni, a friendly chocolate Labrador retriever.

“Students have been amazed by the transformation,” says Luu. “We wanted a space that encourages community and collaboration, one that feels alive and dynamic, and the early feedback suggests that’s exactly what’s happening,” Luu explains. “It also gives us a chance to better connect students not only with what the UAC offers, but also with support across the Institute.

“Last year, the UAC offices were behind these two wooden doors in the Infinite Corridor and you had to know that they were there to get to them,” says junior Caleb Mathewos, who has been a UAC orientation leader and captain over the past two years. “The space is very inviting now. I’ve seen people sitting there and working, or just relaxing between classes. I see my friends every now and then, and I’ll stop by and chat with them. Because it’s so much more open, it makes the UAC feel a lot more accessible to students.”

Senior Calvin Macatantan, who’s been involved with the UAC’s First Generation/Low Income Program since his first year and served as an associate advisor and orientation leader, thinks the new space will make it easier for students — especially first years — to find what they need to navigate at MIT. “Before, resources felt scattered across different parts of the Infinite, even though they had similar missions of advising and supporting students. It's nice that there’s a central, welcoming space where those supports connect, and I think that will make a big difference in how students experience MIT.”

The transformation adds significantly to a trend toward creating more student-centric spaces along the Infinite. In the past few years, MIT has added two new study lounges in Building 3, the DEN and the LODGE, and the Department of Materials Science and Engineering built the DMSE Breakerspace in Building 4. This fall, another office suite along the Infinite will be remodeled into a new tutoring hub.

"It’s wonderful to see the UAC space and the whole advising ‘neighborhood,’ if you will, come to fruition,” says Vice Chancellor for Graduate and Undergraduate Education David L. Darmofal. “The need to strengthen undergraduate advising and the opportunity to do so through an Institute advising hub was an outcome of the Task Force 2021 effort, and it’s taken years of thoughtful reflection by many stakeholders to lay the foundation for such a significant sea change in advising. This space is a tangible, visible commitment to putting students first.”

Technology is supercharging the attack on democracy by making it easier to spy on people, block free speech, and control what we do. The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s activists, lawyers, and technologists are fighting back. Join the movement to Take Back CTRL.

DONATE TODAY

Join EFF and Fight Back

Take Back CTRL is EFF's new website to give you insight into the ways that technology has become the veins and arteries of rising global authoritarianism. It’s not just because of technology’s massive power to surveil, categorize, censor, and make decisions for governments—but also because the money made by selling your data props up companies and CEOs with clear authoritarian agendas. As the preeminent digital rights organization, EFF has a clear role to play.

If You Use Technology, This Fight Is Yours.

EFF was created for scary moments like the one we’re facing now. For 35 years, EFF has fought to ensure your rights follow you online and wherever you use technology. We’ve sued, we’ve analyzed, we’ve hacked, we’ve argued, and we’ve helped people be heard in halls of power.

But we're still missing something. You.

Because it's your rights we're fighting for:

• Your right to speak and learn freely online, free of government censorship
• Your right to move through the world without being surveilled everywhere you go
• Your right to use your device without it tracking your every click, purchase, and IRL movement
• Your right to control your data, including data about your body, and to know that data given to one government agency won’t be weaponized against you by another
• Your right to do what you please with the products and content you pay for
• Consider Take Back CTRL our "help wanted" notice, because we need your help to win this fight today.

Join EFF

The future is being decided today. Join the movement to Take Back CTRL.

The Take Back CTRL campaign highlights the work that EFF is doing to fight for our democracy, defend vulnerable members of our community, and stand up against the use of tech in this authoritarian takeover. It also features actions everyone can take to support EFF’s work, use our tools in their everyday lives, and fight back.

Help us spread the word:

Stop tech from dismantling democracy. Join the movement to Take Back CTRL of our rights. https://eff.org/tbc

Scouting America (formerly known as Boy Scouts) has a new badge in cybersecurity. There’s an image in the article; it looks good.

I want one.

Homes in Kipnuk were washed away on Oct. 12, months after the Trump administration canceled a project to stabilize an eroding riverbank.

Natural gas prices are rising as the U.S. exports more LNG. That has created an opening for the coal industry.

A new study explains how a booming economy negated advancements in lowering carbon intensity.

The government shutdown could scuttle a bipartisan Senate delegation to Brazil.

The young activists say a federal judge made a mistake in rejecting their challenge against the president’s energy executive orders.

In a letter, the European Commission president defends the 2040 goal but offers several concessions to governments.

Mycelium, the root structure of mushrooms, is being used to make materials that a local company says are more sustainable than brick and mortar.

Researchers mapped livestock supply chains from feed to grocery store to find the biggest influence on beef’s greenhouse gas emissions.

The coalition says it will develop a framework that eliminates double-counting carbon pollution and attributes emissions to their sources.

Commercial shipping accounts for 3 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions globally. As the sector sets climate goals and chases a carbon-free future, nuclear power — long used as a source for military vessels — presents an enticing solution. To date, however, there has been no clear, unified public document available to guide design safety for certain components of civilian nuclear ships. A new “Nuclear Ship Safety Handbook” by the MIT Maritime Consortium aims to change that and set the standard for safe maritime nuclear propulsion.

“This handbook is a critical tool in efforts to support the adoption of nuclear in the maritime industry,” explains Themis Sapsis, the William I. Koch Professor of Mechanical Engineering at MIT, director of the MIT Center for Ocean Engineering, and co-director of the MIT Maritime Consortium. “The goal is to provide a strong basis for initial safety on key areas that require nuclear and maritime regulatory research and development in the coming years to prepare for nuclear propulsion in the maritime industry.”

Using research data and standards, combined with operational experiences during civilian maritime nuclear operations, the handbook provides unique insights into potential issues and resolutions in the design efficacy of maritime nuclear operations, a topic of growing importance on the national and international stage. 

“Right now, the nuclear-maritime policies that exist are outdated and often tied only to specific technologies, like pressurized water reactors,” says Jose Izurieta, a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (MechE) Naval Construction and Engineering (2N) Program, and one of the handbook authors. “With the recent U.K.-U.S. Technology Prosperity Deal now including civil maritime nuclear applications, I hope the handbook can serve as a foundation for creating a clear, modern regulatory framework for nuclear-powered commercial ships.”

The recent memorandum of understanding signed by the U.S. and U.K calls for the exploration of “novel applications of advanced nuclear energy, including civil maritime applications,” and for the parties to play “a leading role informing the establishment of international standards, potential establishment of a maritime shipping corridor between the Participants’ territories, and strengthening energy resilience for the Participants’ defense facilities.”

“The U.S.-U.K. nuclear shipping corridor offers a great opportunity to collaborate with legislators on establishing the critical framework that will enable the United States to invest on nuclear-powered merchant vessels — an achievement that will reestablish America in the shipbuilding space,” says Fotini Christia, the Ford International Professor of the Social Sciences, director of the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society (IDSS), director of the MIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Center, and co-director of the MIT Maritime Consortium.

“With over 30 nations now building or planning their first reactors, nuclear energy’s global acceptance is unprecedented — and that momentum is key to aligning safety rules across borders for nuclear-powered ships and the respective ports,” says Koroush Shirvan, the Atlantic Richfield Career Development Professor in Energy Studies at MIT and director of the Reactor Technology Course for Utility Executives.

The handbook, which is divided into chapters in areas involving the overlapping nuclear and maritime safety design decisions that will be encountered by engineers, is careful to balance technical and practical guidance with policy considerations.

Commander Christopher MacLean, MIT associate professor of the practice in mechanical engineering, naval construction, and engineering, says the handbook will significantly benefit the entire maritime community, specifically naval architects and marine engineers, by providing standardized guidelines for design and operation specific to nuclear powered commercial vessels.

“This will assist in enhancing safety protocols, improve risk assessments, and ensure consistent compliance with international regulations,” MacLean says. “This will also help foster collaboration amongst engineers and regulators. Overall, this will further strengthen the reliability, sustainability, and public trust in nuclear-powered maritime systems.”

Anthony Valiaveedu, the handbook’s lead author, and co-author Nat Edmonds, are both students in the MIT Master’s Program in Technology and Policy (TPP) within the IDSS. The pair are also co-authors of a paper published in Science Policy Review earlier this year that offered structured advice on the development of nuclear regulatory policies.

“It is important for safety and technology to go hand-in-hand,” Valiaveedu explains. “What we have done is provide a risk-informed process to begin these discussions for engineers and policymakers.”

“Ultimately, I hope this framework can be used to build strong bilateral agreements between nations that will allow nuclear propulsion to thrive,” says fellow co-author Izurieta.

Impact on industry

“Maritime designers needed a source of information to improve their ability to understand and design the reactor primary components, and development of the 'Nuclear Ship Safety Handbook' was a good step to bridge this knowledge gap,” says Christopher J. Wiernicki, American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) chair and CEO. “For this reason, it is an important document for the industry.”

The ABS, which is the American classification society for the maritime industry, develops criteria and provides safety certification for all ocean-going vessels. ABS is among the founding members of the MIT Maritime Consortium. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp., HD Korea Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering, and Delos Navigation Ltd. are also consortium founding members. Innovation members are Foresight-Group, Navios Maritime Partners L.P., Singapore Maritime Institute, and Dorian LPG.

“As we consider a net-zero framework for the shipping industry, nuclear propulsion represents a potential solution. Careful investigation remains the priority, with safety and regulatory standards at the forefront,” says Jerry Kalogiratos, CEO of Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. “As first movers, we are exploring all options. This handbook lays the technical foundation for the development of nuclear-powered commercial vessels.”

Sangmin Park, senior vice president at HD Korea Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering, says “The 'Nuclear Ship Safety Handbook' marks a groundbreaking milestone that bridges shipbuilding excellence and nuclear safety. It drives global collaboration between industry and academia, and paves the way for the safe advancement of the nuclear maritime era.”

Maritime at MIT

MIT has been a leading center of ship research and design for over a century, with work at the Institute today representing significant advancements in fluid mechanics and hydrodynamics, acoustics, offshore mechanics, marine robotics and sensors, and ocean sensing and forecasting. Maritime Consortium projects, including the handbook, reflect national priorities aimed at revitalizing the U.S. shipbuilding and commercial maritime industries.

The MIT Maritime Consortium, which launched in 2024, brings together MIT and maritime industry leaders to explore data-powered strategies to reduce harmful emissions, optimize vessel operations, and support economic priorities.

“One of our most important efforts is the development of technologies, policies, and regulations to make nuclear propulsion for commercial ships a reality,” says Sapsis. “Over the last year, we have put together an interdisciplinary team with faculty and students from across the Institute. One of the outcomes of this effort is this very detailed document providing detailed guidance on how such effort should be implemented safely.”

Handbook contributors come from multiple disciplines and MIT departments, labs, and research centers, including the Center for Ocean Engineering, IDSS, MechE’s Course 2N Program, the MIT Technology and Policy Program, and the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering.

MIT faculty members and research advisors on the project include Sapsis; Christia; Shirvan; MacLean; Jacopo Buongiorno, the Battelle Energy Alliance Professor in Nuclear Science and Engineering, director, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems, and director of science and technology for the Nuclear Reactor Laboratory; and Captain Andrew Gillespy, professor of the practice and director of the Naval Construction and Engineering (2N) Program.

“Proving the viability of nuclear propulsion for civilian ships will entail getting the technologies, the economics and the regulations right,” says Buongiorno. “This handbook is a meaningful initial contribution to the development of a sound regulatory framework.”

“We were lucky to have a team of students and knowledgeable professors from so many fields,” says Edmonds. “Before even beginning the outline of the handbook, we did significant archival and history research to understand the existing regulations and overarching story of nuclear ships. Some of the most relevant documents we found were written before 1975, and many of them were stored in the bellows of the NS Savannah.”

The NS Savannah, which was built in the late 1950s as a demonstration project for the potential peacetime uses of nuclear energy, was the first nuclear-powered merchant ship. The Savannah was first launched on July 21, 1959, two years after the first nuclear-powered civilian vessel, the Soviet ice-breaker Lenin, and was retired in 1971.

Historical context for this project is important, because the reactor technologies envisioned for maritime propulsion today are quite different from the traditional pressurized water reactors used by the U.S. Navy. These new reactors are being developed not just in the maritime context, but also to power ports and data centers on land; they all use low-enriched uranium and are passively cooled. For the maritime industry, Sapsis says, “the technology is there, it’s safe, and it’s ready.”

“The Nuclear Ship Safety Handbook” is publicly available on the MIT Maritime Consortium website and from the MIT Libraries. 

EFF usually warns of new horrors threatening your rights online, but this Halloween we’ve summoned a few of our own we’d like to share.  Our new Signal Sticker Pack highlights some creatures—both mythical and terrifying—conjured up by our designers for you to share this spooky season.

If you’re new to Signal, it's a free and secure messaging app built by the nonprofit Signal Foundation at the forefront of defending user privacy. While chatting privately, you can add some seasonal flair with Signal Stickers, and rest assured: friends receiving them get the full sticker pack fully encrypted, safe from prying eyes and lurking spirits.

How To Get and Share Signal Stickers

On any mobile device or desktop with the Signal app installed, you can simply click the button below.

Download EFF's Signal Stickers

To share Frights and Rights  

You can also paste the sticker link directly into a signal chat, and then tap it to download the pack directly to the app.

Once they’re installed, they are even easier to share—simply open a chat, tap the sticker menu on your keyboard, and send one of EFF’s spooky stickers.  They’ll then be asked if they’d like to also have the sticker pack.

All of this works without any third parties knowing what sticker packs you have or whom you shared them with. Our little ghosts and ghouls are just between us.

Meet The Encryptids

These familiar champions of digital rights—The Encryptids—are back! Don’t let their monstrous looks fool you; each one advocates for privacy, security, and a dash of weirdness in their own way. Whether they’re shouting about online anonymity or the importance of interoperability, they’re ready to help you share your love for digital rights. Learn more about their stories here, and you can even grab a bigfoot pin to let everyone know that privacy is a “human” right.

Street-Level Surveillance Monsters

On a cool autumn night, you might be on the lookout for ghosts and ghouls from your favorite horror flicks—but in the real world, there are far scarier monsters lurking in the dark: police surveillance technologies. Often hidden in plain sight, these tools quietly watch from the shadows and are hard to spot. That’s why we’ve given these tools the hideous faces they deserve in our Street-Level Surveillance Monsters series, ready to scare (and inform) your loved ones.

Copyright Creatures

Ask any online creator and they’ll tell you: few things are scarier than a copyright takedown. From unfair DMCA claims and demonetization to frivolous lawsuits designed to intimidate people into a hefty payment, the creeping expansion of copyright can inspire as much dread as any monster on the big screen. That’s why this pack includes a few trolls and creeps straight from a broken copyright system—where profit haunts innovation. 

To that end, all of EFF’s work (including these stickers) are under an open CC-BY License, free for you to use and remix as you see fit.

Happy Haunting Everybody!

These frights may disappear with your message, but the fights persist. That’s why we’re so grateful to EFF supporters for helping us make the digital world a little more weird and a little less scary. You can become a member today and grab some gear to show your support. Happy Halloween!

DONATE TODAY

The inaugural PITCH.nano competition, hosted by MIT.nano’s hard technology accelerator START.nano, provided a platform for early-stage startups to present their innovations to MIT and Boston’s hard-tech startup ecosystem.

The grand prize winner was Active Surfaces, a startup that is generating renewable energy exactly where it is going to be used through lightweight, flexible solar cells. Active Surfaces says its ultralight, peel-and-stick panels will reimagine how we deploy photovoltaics in the built environment.

Shiv Bhakta MBA ’24, SM ’24, CEO and co-founder, delivered the winning presentation to an audience of entrepreneurs, investors, startup incubators, and industry partners at PITCH.nano on Sept. 30. Active Surfaces received the grand prize of 25,000 nanoBucks — equivalent to $25,000 that can be spent at MIT.nano facilities.

Why has MIT.nano chosen to embrace startup activity as much as we do? asked Vladimir Bulović, MIT.nano faculty director, at the start of PITCH.nano. “We need to make sure that entrepreneurs can be born out of MIT and can take the next technical ideas developed in the lab out into the market, so they can make the next millions of jobs that the world needs.”

The journey of a hard-tech entrepreneur takes at least 10 years and 100 million dollars, explained Bulović. By linking open tool facilities to startup needs, MIT.nano can make those first few years a little bit easier, bringing more startups to the scale-up stage.

“Getting VCs [venture capitalists] to invest in hard tech is challenging,” explained Joyce Wu SM ’00, PhD ’07, START.nano program manager. “Through START.nano, we provide discounted access to MIT.nano’s cleanrooms, characterization tools, and laboratories for startups to build their prototypes and attract investment earlier and with reduced spend. Our goal is to support the translation of fundamental research to real-world solutions in hard tech.”

In addition to discounted access to tools, START.nano helps early-stage companies become part of the MIT and Cambridge innovation network. PITCH.nano, inspired by the MIT 100K Competition, was launched as a new opportunity this year to introduce these hard-tech ventures to the investor and industry community. Twelve startups delivered presentations that were evaluated by a panel of four judges who are, themselves, venture capitalists and startup founders.

“It is amazing to see the quality, diversity, and ingenuity of this inspiring group of startups,” said judge Brendan Smith PhD ’18, CEO of SiTration, a company that was part of the inaugural START.nano cohort. “Together, these founders are demonstrating the power of fundamental hard-tech innovation to solve the world’s greatest challenges, in a way that is both scalable and profitable.”

Startups who presented at PITCH.nano spanned a wide range of focus areas. In the fields of climate, energy, and materials, the audience heard from Addis Energy, Copernic Catalysts, Daqus Energy, VioNano Innovations, Active Surfaces, and Metal Fuels; in life sciences, Acorn Genetics, Advanced Silicon Group, and BioSens8; and in quantum and photonics, Qunett, nOhm Devices, and Brightlight Photonics. The common thread for these companies: They are all using MIT.nano to advance their innovations.

“MIT.nano has been instrumental in compressing our time to market, especially as a company building a novel, physical product,” said Bhakta. “Access to world-class characterization tools — normally out of reach for startups — lets us validate scale-up much faster. The START.nano community accelerates problem-solving, and the nanoBucks award is directly supporting the development of our next prototypes headed to pilot.”

In addition to the grand prize, a 5,000 nanoBucks audience choice award went to Advanced Silicon Group, a startup that is developing a next-generation biosensor to improve testing in pharma and health tech.

Now in its fifth year, START.nano has supported 40 companies spanning a diverse set of market areas — life sciences, clean tech, semiconductors, photonics, quantum, materials, and software. Fourteen START.nano companies have graduated from the program, proving that START.nano is indeed succeeding in its mission to help early-stage ventures advance from prototype to manufacturing. “I believe MIT.nano has a fantastic opportunity here,” said judge Davide Marini, PhD ’03, co-founder and CEO of Inkbit, “to create the leading incubator for hard tech entrepreneurs worldwide.”

START.nano accepts applications on a monthly basis. The program is made possible through the generous support of FEMSA.